Councillor Mark Wheeler

Liberal Democrat Councillor for Airedale Division

South Craven Service Centre Transportation Study

July 18th, 2008 by mark wheeler
Comment?

At The Craven Area Committee on 29/5/08 members discussed and voted on the proposed schemes.

What a stitch-up! Considering the geographical area of the study and number of schemes discussed at 1st stage it was a blow to see proposed schemes distilled down to so few and in such a reduced area (just Crosshills and Sutton).there were  bus/public transport infrastructure bids(not just moving of stops on a629) thrown out - but depressingly for me similar proposals in Settle study progressed to proposal stage.

 I have been advised by highways area office that Jacobs are looking at a cheaper scheme re. A629 bus stop issue and I would hope that this could be reinstated on the study proposal(as only reason for throwing it off was cost - a whopping great £100,000. Just to move a bus stop!). 

Other schemes seemed inexpensive and practical - traffic calming on grange road Kildwick, pedestrian safety accessing bus stops on Cononley lane end, road markings a6068 cowling - Lancs border - in light of fatalities). Whereas some of schemes that were put forward look pretty lame and possibly overpriced.

If there cannot be any movement on schemes then I would hope that there might be some movement to accommodate the rejected projects on the general highways list of proposed schemes.

21st century policing?

July 18th, 2008 by mark wheeler
Comment?

assorted-wheeler-family-pics-389.jpg

The Police Authority met today to discuss their “Estates Transformation Strategy”. To you and me that probably means closure of police stations. The press have highlighted 4 potential sites for closure - Crosshills, Settle, Ripon, and Knaresborough and it was confirmed last night at Kildwick Parish Meeting by a local Police Inspector. The worrying aspect of this latest development is the linking of it to the review of workforce structures also taking place.

Last year our area suffered through the net loss of 2 officers after a restructure. It seems if the crime statistics point to the marshaling of resources towards Harrogate and york we will suffer again. Therein lies the problem. Reported crime may be down but unreported crime will not have dropped and probably risen. If our local station closes how much harder will it be for us to report incidents of crime(an easy question to answer for those who have tried to wrestle with police phone system), I anticipate many will give up trying.

The morale of our officers is low, Settle officers living in police houses have been given notice of eviction. Whilst I recognise the need for the police to review all aspects of its service I wonder what financial imperative could be behind this. I hope that the multi million £ cost of Harrogates “super station” will not influence the decision, especially in light of the potentially large capital receipt from the sale of 4 pieces of prime real estate.

It seems our community is about to take another hit. First a reduction in our bus service, then post offices and now our police stations are about to go the same way. Surely enough is enough. We deserve as much of a police service as urban areas - crime whatever the perceived level of severity - has a long lasting affect on the victim.

The Police Authority states the following as objectives -

Promoting safer neighbourhoods through - Increasing levels of public satisfaction with the police service

Reducing volume crime

Reducing antisocial behaviour

Promoting safer roads – reducing the number of casualties through road traffic accidents.

Will the closure of our local stations really help them to achieve those objectives? At Crosshills there is talk of a shop front operation manned by civilian staff to field questions (possibly on Main Street). 

Is this really a solution to provide a 21st century police force to deal with the demands of our communities?

There will be a public consultation on these issues - make sure your views are known.

Metro zone 6 - will we ever get it?

July 18th, 2008 by mark wheeler
Comment?

metrotraindiagram.jpg

background 

The Metro Ticketing Scheme, administered by METRO, provides unlimited rail and bus or bus only travel in West Yorkshire.  The area is divided into 5 zones that are centred on Leeds and the cost of the ticket varies depending on the zone you want to travel from.  The most expensive ticket covering zones 1 to 5 is approximately £1,000 pa.  The first “quick win” of the Leeds City Region was to expand the METRO Ticketing scheme to a new zone 6 which would cover Cononley to Gargrave and also to Harrogate and Knaresborough.  The central aim of the Leeds City Region is to remove the barriers within a coherent economic area to allow for growth.  The most important of these is the flexibility of the labour market and the removal of barriers for cross border travel both into Leeds/Bradford etc and also into Craven. 

Funding of a Zone 6 

The aim of the Zone 6 development was to make the scheme cost neutral as the basis of the scheme is that revenue from the ticket is divided between bus and rail operators based on the proportion of usage.  Growth in the scheme for Zone 6 would increase the revenue for the operators.  Total revenues for 2007/8 were £28m. In developing a zone 6 there needs to be a balance between attractiveness for the public and also for the operators.  A key issue here is the price differential between a rail season ticket for Skipton to Leeds (35.60 pw) and the expected cost of a rail only zone 1 to 6 ticket (£36.50).  If bus was then added the operators would only accept a zone 1 to 6 rail plus zone 1 to 5 bus at about £43.30 pw.  The key question here is why switch from a rail season ticket to rail only metro card and would the inclusion of buses in zones 1 to 5 be prohibitively expensive? If a public sector subsidy from NYCC was introduced this could make the product both more attractive for the public and the operators therefore delivering the labour flexibility and a possible shift away from the car.  NYCC have said that they will look at any proposals and discuss the costs and benefits of a subsidy. 

Alternative Products 

It is not certain whether creating two products, a zone 1 – 6 rail only, and a zone 1 to 6 rail plus 1 to 5 bus would be taken up by the public or would it be largely symbolic.  There is the opportunity to develop different more specific products that could support businesses, students, tourists, the social excluded or groups that can travel off peak all at discounts from the main offer.   An example of the business product could be that a company purchases 20 tickets at a 15% discount for any of their staff to use therefore reducing car usage etc.  Students currently pay £5.50 per week for METRO tickets and this could be expanded to zone 6 so allowing students from West Yorkshire to come to Craven College or for outdoor pursuits in the Dales but also Craven Students to go to other colleges and universities and leisure activities in Leeds etc.  The tourist card could allow travel anywhere in the City Region plus discounts to attractions for a week.  

Next Steps

METRO are aiming to introduce a Zone 6 on the 1st January 2009 although what that will comprise of is uncertain.  They will be developing a range of options based on the issues set out above and this should be produced by September. So watch this space for further developments.

An apology

July 1st, 2008 by mark wheeler
Comment?

Due to change of job and a increased number of evening council meetings attended in last few weeks the website has not been updated. This will be remedied in next few days and will be regularly updated from then on.

Sorry once again to those who have visited site and only come across out of date news.

Gargrave Road and all that

April 27th, 2008 by mark wheeler
Comment?

Last week councillors voted to defer a decision to sell council owned land to a local company - Bentleys. In an awe inspiring display of prevarication and fence-sitting after 2 earlier policy committee decisions to sell the land - members decided that sitting on a decision for another 3 months was the best way forward(ie the preferred approach to making a difficult decision is not to make one at all). I am well aware of reports on this issue that might have, should have, been read - they were available for all. I was certainly well briefed and ready to make an informed decision on the night.

Decisions already taken are outlined below -

Council Meeting of 22nd January, 2008, the Council:

 Resolved – That the recommendations in the following minutes are confirmedMinute POL.75 (Relocation of Successful Local Business – Land at Gargrave Road, Skipton) – Recommendation (2) to read as amended below:“That the Council agrees in principle to Option 1, subject to suitable restrictions because of concerns that ad hoc development will cause problems with the infrastructure; that the motion is deferred until the Gargrave Road Task Group and the consultants to be employed have had time to consider the full effect of developing the area and how it relates to the forthcoming Local Development Framework; and that a report back is made to the Council Meeting on 15th April’.” 

Policy Committee recommendation of 19th December 2007 which stated:

 RESOLVED – (1) That the offer made by J N Bentley’s Ltd. for the field OS 5707, Gargrave Road, Skipton is noted.” 

“RECOMMENDED – (2)That field OS 5707, Gargrave Road, Skipton is disposed of to J N Bentley Ltd., subject to the Council at least achieving the market valuation for the land as set out in the Valuation Report at Appendix C to the Director of Community Services’ report (exempt from publication) and planning permission being obtained.”

Even with a full study and the following conclusion was arrived at - 

  Conclusion

8.1       The desk study report by Arup highlights no conclusive constraints to development. All the risks raised in the report have methods to mitigate against them and would be covered through the planning process. Development of land to the south of Gargrave Road, including field OS5707 is seen to be appropriate and the economic benefits it provides would offset any loss of landscape or visual amenity.

8.2       With regard to the north of Gargrave Road Arup do not identify any other major constraints not highlighted in Appendix 1 but this would be entirely dependant on the nature of the proposals submitted.

8.3      Members should be aware that disposal of the site to JN Bentley’s Ltd is subject to securing planning permission and, therefore, is not guaranteed to be delivered.

 

The overriding conclusion was that The development of the site as the  headquarters for an important local business would support the corporate priorities of building a Prosperous District. The original Policy Committee recommendation       will retain a major local employer which will also support the economy and vitality of Skipton.  There are significant risks to the Craven economy if important and large local employers have to relocate from the District. JN Bentley’s Ltd currently employ around 650 people, the loss of the company would have a seriously detrimental effect on the Craven economy through the loss of income, supply chains, types and ranges of jobs, training opportunities and the contribution the business makes as a corporate contribution to the well-being of the area. There are significant risks regarding loss of credibility of Craven District Council with local employers and reputation risks.

With overwhelming evidence to support the land sale it seemed the need to make a difficult but important decision was shelved for politically expendient reasons - why make an unpopular decision when it is election time? Bending over backwards to get a few votes from nimbys is ducking the issue. I am certain that those same councillors would not think twice about voting for this in snaygill or south craven - to move the problem where it will not lose them votes or upset the “preserved in aspic” brigade. Skipton is a vibrant and growing town it needs to prosper - to provide employment for not only the next generation but others to come. There was no real reason to delay this decision. Lets hope that this does not backfire on us and this district loses yet another major business and employer.

Bus routes - changes

April 27th, 2008 by mark wheeler
Comment?

smallbus21.jpgRumours about the cessation of another local bus route have reached me. There are to be changes to some routes in South Craven that will come into force on April 28th. The utilisation of community transport to fulfil routes that were dropped by commercially run Keighley and District will be good news for South Craven villages that are now missed out by the express A629 route between Keighley and Skipton. It will be a service that is very different to what we are used to but it will be better than the service provided before  - more flexible and better suited to the villages of Aire Valley. There is more to come, I am negotiating with the operator to put an extended service for 1 or 2 hours after the school run (16:00 - 18:00) every day monday - saturday. This will be announced when all partners have agreed costs and details.

In the meantime here are details of the new service…

South Craven Village Bus The South Craven Village Bus replaces the current journeys run between 0900 and 1500 by Keighley and District from Monday 28th April 2008. 

How will the South Craven Village Bus run? The South Craven Village Bus will be run as a demand responsive Community Transport service operated by Little Red Bus.  

What is a demand responsive service It is a service where the journeys are only operated  as needed and therefore travel has to be pre-booked. The route and times of journeys will vary according to the journeys booked by passengers and the need to bring together a group of passengers.  

Where can you travel on the Village Bus The area has been split into two zones, Zone 1 covering Lothersdale and Zone 2 covering Farnhill and KIldwick. Please see map over for details of area. You can travel wholly within a zone, between the zone and a connecting point in Croshills for the local bus services to Keighley and Skipton. Some journeys can be run through to Skipton Bus Station or Rail Station. 

 When does the South Craven Village Bus run? Journeys can be made between 0930 and 1500 on a Monday to Saturday.   

 The Booking Arrangements As a Demand Responsive Service passengers must pre-book their travel and to make your bookings contact Craven Voluntary Transport on 01756 701045 between 0800 and 1700  Please remember that journeys are provided on a first come first served basis so it is better if passengers book a day or two before they wish to travel. 

Timed journeys These times are a guide to help passengers to book their journeys. The times are not fixed and can be varied but must start and finish within the time that the Village Bus runs. 

Lothersdale Zone 0945 Lothersdale to Skipton and to make connections with bus to Keighley at 1010 from Crosshills1125 Skipton and Lothersdale and connection with bus from Keighley departing at 1120 in Crosshills 

Farnhill & Kildwick zone 0915 Farnhill and Kildwick to Crosshills for connections to Keighley and Skipton.1135 Farnhill and Kildwick to Crosshills for connections to Keighley and Skipton.1445 Farnhill and Kildwick to Crosshills for connections to Keighley and Skipton. 1000 Crosshills to Kildwick and Farnhill1220 Crosshills to Kildwick and Farnhill with connections from Keighley and Skipton. 1005 and 1225 Kildwick and Farnhill to Skipton 1125 and 1435 Skipton to Farnhill and Kildwick 

Concessionary Travel As a Community Transport service the South Craven Village Bus does not fall within the Concessionary Travel scheme. Passengers who hold a concessionary pass issued by Craven District Council can travel free. Please advise at the time of booking and you must present your pass to the driver when travelling. 

trading standards - newsflash

April 23rd, 2008 by mark wheeler
Comment?

Another scam uncovered by NYCC trading standards department -

North Yorkshire County Council Trading Standards and Regulatory Services are warning business to be aware of companies’ cold telephone calling.

Several local businesses have been targeted by various advertising companies from the Liverpool area, portraying them selves as working on behalf of the local Fire Service, in aid of the Drink, Drive Campaign.

The aim is to get businesses to agree to advertising, anyone who has agreed to have an advert placed, is being charged in the region of £100. Once they agree to this, they are then subjected to an influx of calls from similar companies requesting payment of the same money or offering further advertising.

We have spoken with the local Fire Service, who have informed us that this is not the way they would operate, and they are not currently working in connection with a publication company.

If you need further advice please contact Trading Standards on the details below or contact Consumer Direct on 08454 04 05 06

Mean or what!

April 14th, 2008 by mark wheeler
Comment?

bus.jpgIt  was brought to my attention recently that there were issues over bus operator Burnley and Pendle not accepting free passes from Cowling residents on the 08:55 Colne to Skipton(3 people turned off the bus this week).

Craven District Council assured me that the concessionary passes should be honoured. Any bus driver on this route who might be reading this - you really should be accepting these passes. Not to do so is wrong and just plain mean spirited.

Craven will ensure that this mix up will not happen again. Lets hope this will be the last time this issue is raised again. Life’s tough enough without having to fight and argue for what you are entitled to!

A Shameless Plug

April 14th, 2008 by mark wheeler
Comment?

drystoneradio_img_anim.gifI was recently interviewed by Drystone Radio(a direct consequence of this website). Drystone Radio is a non for profit organisation which broadcasts regularly to the dales with the aim of providing a voice for this community.
David and his team made me feel welcome and skilfully teased out views/opinions in the interview, they took my 15 minutes rambling and made me sound erudite and articulate - quite a feat!

If you would like to listen to some quality radio with a local slant and tackling local issues I suggest you give it a listen. 

South Craven Service Centre Transportation Study

April 14th, 2008 by mark wheeler
Comment?

picture2.jpgThe study has reached consultation stage and residents will shortly receive the list of schemes and the option to rate them. For those people in Cononley, Farnhill and Kildwick there are two schemes that would benefit them and it is vital that the response forms are returned.  If you want these schemes to be approved please lodge your views with the consultation team.

1.  Provision of a footway link along Cononley Road

2.  Re-siting of bus stops on the A629

Previous